Ah so Richard Dawkins has finally exposed his true colours - 'tis an anti-Catholic stance that the privileged one reveals as opposed to an anti-religious one.
Either that or he should keep away from aspects of reality beyond his biological base.
Dawkins wrote on his website: "Hugh Dallas, head of referee development for the Scottish Football Association, has been sacked because he passed on, by email, a joke about the Pope.
"His dismissal was called for by a spokesman for the Roman Catholic Church in Scotland. This nasty little weasel is called Peter Kearney, Director of the Scottish Catholic Media Office.
"Similarly, the chief executive of the Scottish Football Association, responsible for this craven giving-in to Catholic censorship is Stewart Regan. The address of this coward is Scottish Football Association, Hampden Park, Glasgow."
Is our leading scientist (sic) calling for revenge against Kearney and Regan?
And why is religious bigotry and corruption on the Protestant side so neatly sidestepped by a man who claims holistic oversight?
Dawkins continues: "There is no reason to suppose that Dallas was being sectarian in forwarding the joke. Most plausibly he was as revolted as all decent people are by the Pope’s illegal protection of Catholic child-rapists."
Dallas?
Not sectarian??
How humourous is a don able to be???
Yet, on one level, he is surely correct.
It is outrageous that Hugh Dallas was sacked for merely making anti-Papist jests when, both throughout his refereeing and administrative careers, he has exhibited bias, undertaken corrupt activities and manipulated Scottish football for his Hun paymasters.
The other key aspect of this affair was, yet again, brought to our attention by Gerry Coogan.
His full epistle is given below but the reality would appear to be that the SPL, like the English Premier League, utilises television replays to enable the match officials to 'select' the 'correct' decisions to review to the proprietary benefit of bookmakers and the powers that be.
So video technology is neither open source nor to the benefit of a true outcome but merely an illegally used tool for proprietary advantage/manipulation/corruption.
Perhaps if his head wasn't so far up his own narcissistic backside, Dawkins might wish to consider this truth.
Anyway, time for the Man At The Window to update you (this was written two days ago and some information might no longer be valid).
"Dallas's sacking is such a significant development that I suppose it was inevitable that even the press would eventually find out.
"I yet haven't seen any of this weekend's MSM propaganda but I know that Dallas's business partner, Dougie McDonald, has also become yesterday's man, albeit six weeks too late to save the establishment from melt-down. Dallas and McDonald are business partners in a Spanish property venture. (Would you buy a second-hand villa from these men, Jose?)
There was no conflict of interest there, then, when Dallas was deciding whether to recommend to the referees' panel that the Category One Liar ought to be sacked. Not that there would have been much chance of the hearing giving DougieDougie a P45. It's not called the Referees Panel for nothing - all of its members, to a man, are either serving referees themselves or retired whistlers.
"But there remain unanswered questions over the Tannadice incident which lit the blue touchpaper. It is still not understood why McDonald changed his mind about awarding Celtic a penalty nor is it clear why he should have felt the need to lie about the process of reassessing his original decision. Neither his first version nor the subsequent amended version makes sense.
"There is a growing conviction amongst Celtic supporters that the real villain of the piece remains undetected.
"We are speaking here of John McKendrick, the fourth official on that day, who was watching the live TV broadcast on a monitor in front of him during the match. Hoops followers are of the opinion that McKendrick, rather than Stephen Craven, was the one who fed McDonald with an excuse to reverse the penalty award.
"If FIFA were aware that Category A match officials were making illegal use of video replays during the match, there would of course be terrifying repercussions for the Caledonian goat-bothering Brotherhood.
"Nevertheless, it is the only explanation of the events which makes sense of the observed facts. Craven had immediately taken his position at the edge of the six-yard box when McDonald awarded the penalty, showing that he had no concerns over the validity of the award. He did not subsequently raise his flag while the Dundee United players surrounded the referee with protests. Immediately after the TV broadcast had shown a replay, live pictures showed an alarmed expression sweep across the whistler's boat race, almost as if he had heard something in his earpiece, then after a few moments of indecision, he turned towards the bye-line and spoke to the Assistant Referee.
Play then resumed with a dropped ball; meanwhile, the TV captured a memorable image of Stephen Craven looking totally bewildered and very displeased indeed.
"It should be noted here that the former Head of Refereeing Development had assembled a group of match officials who had advanced to the top of the national game by realising that Dallas was wont to give low scores to referees who "incorrectly" gave big decisions TO Celtic but was unlikely to punish errors that went AGAINST the paranoid Tims. Thus, an ambitious whistler doesn't need to be a bigot himself in order to practice a pro-Rangers, anti-Celtic agenda; he merely needs to do what ever is necessary to score the highest assessment marks. Knowing that Dallas had the final say on these scores makes it easier for the objective observer to understand why referees are less likely to give Celtic the benefit of the doubt.
"Last Thursday, John McKendrick miraculously just happened to walk through the door of a BBC Radio Scotland studio at the precise moment when the volunteer Hun propagandist, Chick Young, was regaling the head of the Israeli referees - in a live broadcast! - with an imaginative account of why the SFA required the services of foreign officials. McKendrick eagerly took over and spun the story into an even more fanciful dimension, displaying the faultless integrity for which Scottish referees are now recognised, in a heroic effort to ensure that the SFA's best efforts to save the fixture list would be sabotaged from within the football establishment.
"McKendrick undoubtedly has a higher motivation than most to ensure that the facts of the matter at Tannadice do not emerge from the fog of deceit and misdirection, a fog that could not have persisted without unstinting, whole-hearted help and support from the charlatans in the Scottish media. Huns with laptops."
Hail Hail!!
© Football Is Fixed/Dietrological
