Those behind the appointment of David Skipwith Pemsel to the throne of chief executive of the Premier League are attempting to paint a public portrait of a man who exhibits heightened integrity.
We oppose that narrative.
Here we put together a list of twenty pertinent questions to ask of Integrity Man regarding the Premier League template of systemic corruption that he not only inherits but also helped to enable.
In our humble opinion, Integrity Man is not a Fit and Proper Person to run the Premier League.
****************************************************************************************************************
Question One:
On the systemic corruption & matchfixing template currently controlling the Premier League
Since Scudamore scooted off with his £5 million facilitation bonus, a systemic corruption and matchfixing template has been implanted on the Premier League. The lack of any effective oversight (the reason Richard Masters failed to be considered for the permanent CEO role apparently) has produced extensive issues of integrity-lite games.
Around two-thirds of Premier League matches are known to have been insider trading and/or matchfixing events in the post-Scudamore window.
Integrity Man, will any strategies be developed to prevent future occurrences of this systemic matchfixing and will any action be taken against those individuals within your orbit who have orchestrated this gross conversion of the soul of football for criminalised private wealth creation?
Or, Integrity Man, is everything black market, grey market or white seen as a valid revenue stream for a Premier League under your stewardship?
************************************************************************
Question Two:
On the illicit linkages between the Guardian newspaper and certain football agents during Skipwith's period as chief executive of Guardian Media Group
The Guardian stands out in one way from other mainstream sports media - the control of output by rogue agents. It began a decade ago with John Colquhoun and Key Sports Management clients like Theo Walcott receiving extensive advertorial coverage in the periods leading up to new contract negotiations with Arsenal FC. But, during Skipwith's window of control of the newspaper, the situation has become ludicrous infecting not only allegedly factual articles but also match reports - the reality of games being rewritten for future agent gains.
The nadir of unjournalism was reached when Unique Sports Management was formed by █████ █████ and entire campaigns of promotional disinformation were perpetrated repeatedly - the campaign to inflate the value of Wilfried Zaha in the summer of 2019 was as manipulative as it was unsuccessful. The Guardian repeatedly priced a player at up to £100 million when neutral arbiters were valuing at £40 million. That £60 million profit, if it had been successful, would have been a tidy £9 million bonus for the agent with trickledown for 'associates'.
Integrity Man, we have had it suggested to us by interested parties that the Guardian Media Group has inappropriately close linkages with Unique Sports Management - please say it ain't so Integrity Man, because surely that couldn't be appropriate, could it?
And, Integrity Man, how will this alleged association impact upon your role of CEO of the EPL?
Will Mr Colquhoun remain a puppet-master?
************************************************************************
Question Three:
On the deliberate use of a fake news lead story at the Guardian in November 2018 in an attempt to influence a legal ruling about to be made regarding the extradition to the US of Julian Assange
The fake Manafort/Assange headline has been shown to be a fabrication see - The Wikileaks' Thread - The Futures Of Julian Assange And Journalism Are Inextricably Linked - and yet editor Kath Viner hasn't apologised nor removed the invented content from Guardian servers. To maliciously interfere in such an important judicial case for the future of real journalism to the detriment of the profession that creates a newspaper suggests that Integrity Man is not interested in real journalism nor real judicial process.
Thomas Scripps has shown (see the 'Wikileaks' link above) that the Guardian is a willing mouthpiece for the intelligence community presumably being rewarded for their acquiescence to deep state agendas e.g. the persecution of a journalist who exposed US & UK war crimes.
The Guardian fall to fake began in earnest when Viner and Pemsel took the reins. The entire culture of the newspaper altered with overheads slashed and 'intriguing' new forms of (sometimes highly questionable, or even illicit) revenue streams created.
Even former editor Alan Rusbridger markedly disagrees with the new regime stencilling the Guardian to the detriment of journalism - see US Efforts To Jail Assange For Espionage Are A Grave Threat To A Free Media.
The Guardian is no longer a newspaper of consequence due to Integrity Man's neoliberal agendas and █████ strategies.
Integrity Man, will you be employing similarly skewed strategies at the Premier League and, if so, may we assume that the fans matter not one fucking jot?
************************************************************************
Question Four:
On the offshore underground entity that is the Scott Trust and examples of the Guardian business model under Skipwith's stewardship where fake news influenced sporting realities to private agendas
The entire Guardian edifice exists under the Scott Trust.
This is a very secretive entity.
This is not a good thing - there must be a declaration of the real ownership of a newspaper (just like there needs to be with a footballer).
In both cases hidden ownership creates corruption.
Under Skipwith, the Guardian repeatedly explored regime change, orchestrating fake realities to achieve integrated commercial gains.
Take the removal of Mark Sampson from the post of manager of England Women's team.
The whole process was a Guardian coup.
Agencies e.g. Tongue Tied (linked to █████ █████) formed a network to share disinformation on Sampson and inflated promotion of Eni Aluko (soon to be appointed a Guardian 'journalist') and, even though nothing was proven against Sampson, the coup was successful when the FA found a historical reason to remove him.
The parallel campaign to bring in Phil Neville was also a Guardian hidden agenda and the manner in which the paper dealt with "Neville's battering the missus" comment was a triumph of edited bias.
Meanwhile, four members of the England Lionesses are represented by an agent who is a known mafia man (having been convicted in Italy) and who has a global ban on intermediary activities.
Surprisingly, the Guardian doesn't publish this information in their comic as it doesn't fit with the spectacularly fake narrative.
Or take the equivalent bifurcation between the Guardian campaign against Jose Mourinho and all things Gestifute in comparison to the fairy tales created for managers linked to Mr Colquhoun - Roy Hodgson, Brendan Rodgers, Steve McClaren etc etc. And Mr Colquhoun was amply rewarded when Manchester United and Mourinho parted company when the incoming manager Ole Gunnar Solskjaer thought it wise to further extend the contract of the inept Phil Jones.
So, Integrity Man, we guess that you approved these campaigns at the newspaper where you are chief executive. How will this impact on your new role as an independent non-biased overseer of the English top league?
And, are mafia agents okay? Is regime change based on fallacy a prerequisite for all of your strategies? And why is the Scott Trust so hidden? What do they have to hide?
Why is everything so murky around you, Integrity Man?
N.B. The Guardian, we have been informed, now want Phil Neville sacked as there is a new more malleable persona on hand for managing the Lionesses, but I guess you are more than aware of that, Integrity Man?
************************************************************************
Question Five:
On the weaponisation of identity politics to aid corruption and control of markets - transfer and betting
The business model developed by Skipwith at the Guardian is allegedly inspirational...
... but it is only inspirational in that short-termist sort of way so beloved of disaster capitalists and fascistic neoliberals like Skipwith and Colquhoun.
Punters pay to keep the Guardian afloat because the paper panders to their identity politics while pretending that it is a force for good in the wider world.
Once this pretence fails, there is nothing left - just a bubble and a lot of befuddled liberals wondering where there feelgood pseudo-reality has gone.
The Guardian has no value because it is nothing.
It is a vacuum.
Or, if it is anything, it is a collection of white and grey market strategies (directly linked to the black) that create profits behind a front of fake media - just like the carpet shops that were fronts for cocaine importation in the UK before the Albanian Shqiptare mafia took control of the trade outside of Merseyside.
We live in a narcissistic world and Skipwith's entire strategy is based on selling a lie while telling readers that they are amazing.
Short-termism is a disease and not a fault that will sit well in oversight of the Premier League.
Integrity Man, under your control of the Guardian, why has the paper developed a business model akin to the Albanian mafia? Is that what football can expect from the Premier League under your tutelage in future - a fake front hiding lucrative corruption?
We are taking the piss here with this question, Integrity Man, because we know you know that we know you know the answer.
************************************************************************
Question Six:
On the very specific issue of matchfixing and insider trading that has reached epidemic proportions in the Premier League
The problem with mafia templates is that once they are firmly ensconced in the landscape, they are largely immovable other than by other mafia entities moving onto their patch.
And once established there can be only limited policing and the reactive construction of any regulatory barriers (suitably loopholed for future corruptions, of course).
In allowing this period of cowboy free market matchfixing in the post-Scudamore era, the Premier League (under the interim board) has given mafia absolute control of the English game.
The sport has become theatre, but a dark underground theatre where outcomes of games are set to investments made on those results.
Of course, Integrity Man, you will have garnered most of this sort of stuff from Mr Colquhoun but how on earth do you intend to rid the Premier League of mafia influences?
In fact, do you intend to rid the Premier League of mafia influences.?...
... therein lies the rub.
************************************************************************
Question Seven:
On venture capitalism
Mirabile dictu, although not as fucked up as private equity, venture capitalists are still a wunch of bankers.
And they live in a world of make-believe according to the Economist whose view is that venture capitalists are unable to perceive the value of their investments due to a lack of perspective even though they cast themselves, in their egotistically bubbled infallibility, as the ultimate arbiters of value.
"... it is good to see public investors shouting when an entrepreneur, for all his chutzpah, has no clothes."
A primary problem with both private equity and venture capital is short-termism.
Aside from enlightened strategic investors like Munger and Buffett at Berkshire Hathaway, the short-term is the beam of focus for the vast majority of the institutional investors.
Now short-termism works on matters like fixing a football match or inflating a transfer fee (or an initial public offering) or sacking lots of people, stripping out the value but persuading a few fuckwits that the emperor is really wearing clothes while running his newspaper; but optimising business strategies for the immediate term means, by choice, that there's a lack of positive correlation between current actions and longer term strategies and development.
And then chaos reigns...
... eventually.
In businesses like the Premier League where image is everything, this lack of strategic planning will be its downfall - when the degree of matchfixing and insider trading plus the extent to which certain media and institutions are involved in these criminalities breaks through into the zeitgeist of public opinion, the ability to sell Zaha for a few quid more will be freakily pointless.
You can fool some of the people some of the time, Integrity Man, but we will soon be able to see that you stand there stark bollock naked.
Integrity Man, how do you intend to develop real sustainable strategy within your myopic short-termism?
Or, Integrity Man, is it the case that you have no intention of anything other than grabbing as much booty as possible and then doing a runner with your chums once all the value has been sucked out of English football?
And football will be left to function like that Sport of Kings horseracing - as a betting medium for insiders, patsies and crooks?
************************************************************************
Question Eight:
On 'Football Leaks' and the commercialisation of crime
Although the Guardian largely sat on the sidelines in the latter phases of the utilisation of the criminal entity 'Football Leaks', that was only because the Football is Fixed Network had exposed that John Colquhoun was the wee man behind this farce. This prevented the paper taking ownership of the story which ended up being doled out by Der Spiegel.
Rui Pinto is a blackmailer who was coerced to act as a fall guy for the physical theft of documents to the benefit of a cartel of UK soccer agents and to the detriment of Gestifute and Doyen Sports.
Mr Colquhoun has a bit of a fetish for secrecy - he was also behind the 'Secret Footballer' nonsense at the Guardian and used scores of different aliases in contacts with members of the Football is Fixed Network - the man has a complication of personality disorders underpinning his psychopathy.
The irony is that the illegality of Third Party Ownership (TPO) was allegedly the campaigning reason why the Guardian initially promoted the 'Football Leaks' releases and yet TPO is widespread now across the English game.
The commercial reasons the Guardian got involved relate to external battles over turf and complex contractual interplays allowing profit to be internalised in secret.
Is this how venture capital now works, Integrity Man?
So.
Integrity Man.
Any chance of following through and addressing TPO in the Premier League or under the control of UK agents in other leagues?
I could give you a bunch of names.
************************************************************************
Question Nine:
On the Professional Game Match Officials Board and systemic matchfixing
The PGMOB refereeing body is a corrupt Stalinist entity that is rotten to the core - over 90% of the systemic matchfixing in the Premier League has the PGMOB at its roots. Mike Riley, the alleged controller of this criminal grouping, should be sacked with immediate effect. The Select Group of referees should be disbanded because the shit has truly risen to the top. There should be a far wider network of officials (including from other countries) and no officials should get more than a handful of games per season.
The creation of an elite group of referees hasn't worked.
It has produced a small grouping who have been incorporated into a mafia.
The Premier League has the most compromised grouping of match officials of any of the other major leagues.
Integrity Man, we understand that some of your mates are well rewarded by the illicit structures of the PGMOB but what are you going to do now you are CEO regarding referee-based corruption in the EPL?
Are you going to do something positive for football or just regard referee matchfixing as a necessary input to betting market control and hence valid for the profit margins?
************************************************************************
Question Ten:
On VAR and mafia influence of match decisions
In all other leagues, VAR has been a success yet in the Premier League it has been made a tool of the corruption rather than an enhancer of integrity. Obviously, the PGMOB entity is a problem here but the technology implementation and corruption of personnel are where the real matchfixing loci reside.
See - The VAR Room - The Twilight Zone Where All Future Matchfixing Will Be Orchestrated
The Premier League and the PGMOB are flouting the IFAB rules on the use of video technology. Originally the PGMOB planned not to have pitchside monitors at all and, when forced to employ them, they simply instructed the referees never to use them.
The EPL version of VAR is opaque and primed for matchfixing.
This situation isn't helped by Neil Swarbrick being Head of VAR at the PGMOB which, given his relationship with matchfixing agent John Colquhoun, is surely problematical.
Integrity Man, why can't we have a version of VAR that promotes integrity and improves the sport? Why do we have a version that increases matchfixing and insider trading? Will VAR just be another illicit input to your revenue streams?
************************************************************************
Question Eleven:
On the issues of corruption in the English Championship and the lower leagues
Although Skipwith's territory is to be the Premier League, inevitably the culture developed at the top table influences developments further down.
The Championship already functions like a very very very corrupt casino and is obviously ripe for a Premier League takeover.
But as profit never trickles down in neoliberal structures, the lower leagues only have two routes to sustainability - a sugar daddy (often laundering ill-gotten gains) or matchfixing.
Or both.
When Bury FC were driven to extinction while two of the three richest teams in the world sit in the same locale, the Economist commented that there is no hope for lower league clubs to breakeven as the clubs are not sustainable and there are no redistributive networks - the lower tier clubs know that survival depends on fighting in every available market (illicit or not).
So you get outfits like Billericay or AFC Wimbledon who would appear to primarily function as gambling
Integrity Man, I'm sure you don't give a flying fuck, but will you take any measures at all that are progressive and allow poorer brethren to exist as community football teams without bookmakers taking control?
************************************************************************
Question Twelve:
On systemic corruption and matchfixing underpinning the 2019/20 season and comparisons with a broadly equivalent template throughout the post-Scudamore window
None of our offices in England, Geece or Romania bother subscribing to live Premier League footage anymore - the interest resides elsewhere in the hierarchical global markets.
Life is short and there is not enough time to spend a couple of hours watching a boiler room scam of an agreed result where Liverpool defeat Brighton & Hove Albion (but absolutely only by one goal).
In Skipwith's world, everybody wins...
... apart from fans, media out of the loop, the gamblers being exploited and the integrity of the game.
Of course, the Football is Fixed Network pay others to watch the matches on our behalf as the visuals are immensely revealing in football compared to other very fixed sports like horseracing or snooker or cricket.
When Joe Hart was on one, fans knew it.
When Mike Dean is fluttering around, we know the score.
When a high percentage of the mistakes that lead to goals are made by clients of a small number of agents or players who are third party owned, the analyst knows that the fixing is systemic.
Fake commentary inputs can only disguise these crimes for a while and the corrupt implementation of VAR will eventually result in the refereeing body being fully exposed as a criminalised body that it has been since Riley took over.
Last season, the EPL was systemically fixed.
So is this season.
And this season the corruption template is more extensive and more robust.
Liverpool were always going to win the Premier League in 2019/20 because when you accumulate all the legal marginal gains and sum them with the bigger body of illegal ones, you gain success.
Like with Team Sky in le Tour de France, the titles are gained but they are tainted and temporary as in the end, all corruption will be Lance Armstronged.
Integrity Man, what are your views of criminalised marginal gains?
************************************************************************
Question Thirteen:
On the very central role of mafia in all aspects of the Premier League
"I am told that myself and my network should be careful as we are being spied upon. 'Don't trust anyone, not even your colleagues', they say. Then there are the threats, the pitiful hacking and murder attempts that are aimed to act as a Chinese water torture - drip, drip, drip..."
"A whistleblower is killed slowly, day after day, before bombs explode or cars are crushed. The mafia never kills non-mafiosi just for vendetta. There is always another reason - to eliminate a person who has discovered something that must not be discovered."
"Who are these men of the state who, by negotiating with mafia, have allowed them to take control of football. The state doesn't want whistleblowers investigating their crimes. They hate us. But the state plays a dangerous game - when a mafia infects a state, it is a cancer and a mafia state is always the creation."
"We now live in a mafia state - a state that, in order to preserve the status quo, has to remove whistleblowers who want justice. Why is the state so weak that it becomes an accomplice in systemic crime?"
"We must rebel against this system and this mafia method."
Like Nino Di Matteo, Daphne Caruana Galizia, Julian Assange, Jan Kuciak and Victoria Marinova, the Football is Fixed Network stand up against this mafia method...
... but, in future, we do so entirely from the underground.
Integrity Man, just fuck right off.
No questions asked.
************************************************************************
Question Fourteen:
On the helicopter occurrence that killed Vichai Srivaddhanaprabha a year ago
In three weeks time it will have been a year since the helicopter incident that killed Vichai Srivaddhanaprabha and four others after the fixed BT Sport-covered match between Leicester City and West Ham United refereed by Michael Oliver.
Two key aspects stand out over this event.
Firstly, having spoken with pilots, aircraft engineers, the intelligence community contacts in our network and military specialists, there is widespread incredulity at the official story that there were issues with the helicopter and that these deaths were an accident - and one of these individuals has worked with Jim Swire on the Lockerbie bombing and previously designed aircraft engines for Rolls Royce so we are not talking conspiracy theory here.
Secondly, the betting market control of Leicester City games had been coordinated since 2015/16 by a small cartel until just prior to the fatal match against West Ham United when the entire market infrastructure fell to bits. Considering the sheer volume traded on Leicester City matches, the loss of market control was a major financial hit. The Football is Fixed Network believe that the warfare over betting market control was a contributory input to this affair.
Integrity Man, it would help if the report into the aircrash might happen this side of Armageddon. But will you undertake to explore the other narratives regarding this dreadful crash? And, after Emiliano Sala's fatal plane crash related to illicit intermediaries and half-cocked regulations, will you endeavour to move football away from these concentric mafia circles and return the sport to its rightful place in society?
And, Integrity Man, the Guardian newspaper and John Colquhoun worked very closely on the regime change at Leicester City where Claude Puel was given agent-led player underperformance so that Brendan Rodgers could be stolen from Celtic. As the betting markets linked to Leicester City have continued to be "interesting" post-coup and given your fortuitous links, perhaps you could try and solve how the outcomes of the Foxes games are always known pre-match?
Could you do that for football, Integrity Man?
************************************************************************
Question Fifteen:
On the extensive corruption in the transfer market, the increasing presence of third party ownership, the creation of new agencies for specific purposes and how hidden ownership of players solicits matchfixing
As we touched on above, Third Party Ownership (TPO) is a real issue.
Markets depend on efficiency - the belief that all information is reflected in a price.
This is not the case in a corrupt market.
If Liverpool are definitely going to beat Brighton & Hove Albion by one goal to nil then there are a whole load of markets that should be priced as certainties.
Similarly, but to a different template, with the transfer market.
Skipwith's paper repeatedly shows how to inflate the transfer fees of clients from Key Sports Management, Base Agency, Unique Sports Management and Stellar by using newspaper output.
The transfer market is hence made inefficient for proprietary benefit.
But these two corruption templates merge with TPO.
When the ownership of a player is invisible then we have a problem.
The vast majority of TPO players engage in matchfixing on behalf of their 'owners'...
... who are, of course, invisible.
So, when █████ █████ lets in the goal, we know it is an 'error created by the market' but we don't know who is profiting to what degree or in which offshore centre or mafia state the money will eventually be laundered.
TPO is akin to tax evasion - it is underground, non-democratic and destroys whatever it was leeched from - a country, a business, a league, a club, a sport...
Integrity Man, we understand that you developed a real interest in the area of TPO when the Guardian was avidly promoting Jadon Sancho after he had been stolen from Manchester City and prior to his new representation by the Elite Project Group.
So, Integrity Man, as CEO of the EPL will you say no to TPO?
************************************************************************
Question Sixteen:
On the issue of club owners who are neither fit nor proper
A club only has as much integrity as its owner.
There is both an absence of any meaningful Fit & Proper Person Test (FPPT) for club custodians in the Premier League and there is an equivalent absence of any obstructive regulation between a club owner and a variety of corruptions.
Matchfixing is a given if the club owner is a bookmaker or a high stakes professional gambler who runs a betting consortium for other Premier League entities, for example.
If there are no FPPTs then the efficiency of the transfer market becomes distorted by private concerns (with appropriate media backing of the sort Slipwith's newspaper provides), and the result is backhanders and kickbacks as agents and owners lubricate revenue flows accordingly - as a Blackpool FC fan it was disappointing to hear that such practices are already surfacing at the Seasiders post-Oyston.
Many of these corruptions lead to money laundering and offshore activities that privatise the status of the game into criminalised tax evasion spheres.
Integrity Man, unless gambling interests are removed from Premier League football, the game is up.
If club owners engage in insider trading and offering brokerage facilities for other insider traders then there are numerous occasions where the financial requirements of the owner are at odds with the fan.
You have dealt closely (yet obviously unknowingly) with individuals who are involved in systemic matchfixing so it would be facile for you to create an overview of how to address rogue owners undertaking matchfixing.
The question is, Integrity Man, will you fucking well do it?
************************************************************************
Question Seventeen:
On the widespread prevalence of doping in the EPL
In the football season after Skipwith became chief executive of the Orwellian, Leicester City robbed the Premier League title via extensive doping (Dr Mark Bonar, MAPEI, Team Sky-influenced) and the most biased refereeing that our analysts have witnessed in any major football league as far back as our records go - see The End Of Play (Extra Time).
UK Anti Doping is pro-doping...
... or, rather, pro-looking the other way while doping becomes systemic.
Insiders like doping because it rigs markets unbeknown to non-insiders.
Football teams like doping as it provides a competitive advantage.
Media like doping as it enhances the action if players are running around like headless chickens.
And big pharma likes doping because it creates markets for their illicit products - remember Bayer Leverkusen and the Champions League Final year.
But doping is anti-sporting.
In the last round of Champions League group games, Slavia Prague (by no means a young side) covered 128 kilometres in their game while Paris St Germain ran just 105 kilometres in their match - that equivalenced to every one of the outfield Slavia players covering 22 metres more every minute than PSG ones.
How?
Perhaps CITIC or Sonobo (Slavia's owners) know?
Doping is rampant in the Premier Leaguetoo and is accepted as a legitimate form of advantage by the powers-that-be because doping is highly regressive - it is the richest teams that have bespoke doping, not Buxton Town.
For a start, Integrity Man, perhaps you could explain why the player and team yardage covered figures for the Premier League are regarded as a trade secret with none of the media sharing this data with their audience or readership?
Why can't we see the variation in yardage covered by Jamie Vardy over a season?
You're not going to bother doing anything to stop doping either, are you Integrity Man?
************************************************************************
Question Eighteen:
On the state
█████ █████ █████ █████ █████ █████ █████ █████ █████ █████
█████ █████ █████ █████ █████ █████ █████ █████
█████ █████ █████ █████ █████ █████ █████ █████ █████ █████ █████ █████ █████ █████
█████ █████
█████ █████
█████ █████ █████ █████
█████ █████ █████ █████ █████ █████ █████ █████ █████ █████ █████ █████ █████ █████
█████ █████
█████ █████
█████ █████ █████ █████
Football is Fixed Network - Check Bucuresti Server
"The state, any state, allows corruption to proceed if the internal gross profits related to the corruption exceeds the losses to the Treasury" - that was the holistic advice of my late lawyer David McNeight when we confronted George Osborne (then Chancellor of the Exchequer) over his knowledge of corruption in British football and those weird little payments to Chinese entities. It remains a minor source of joy and comfort that our network helped this unpleasant little man out of politics.
So, take horseracing - when we approached British Horserace Betting Levy Board chief executive Rodney Brack with evidence of corruption in British racing in the mid-nineties, it was made very clear to us that the state profited from gambling and that it would not be in our interests to continue our research.
The same variety of implied threats followed our disclosures about Osborne.
Given Skipwith's close ties with the intelligence community while at the Guardian, we make the assumption that Integrity Man is acceptable to the state.
Integrity Man, on the whole would you agree that mafia state structures are anti-democratic and strip any vestige of essence from any reality? And, Integrity Man, if football is to be slaughtered on the altar of underworld profits can we at least have a government anti-corruption entity that maintains some semblance of sporting competition among the mafia strategies?
************************************************************************
Question Nineteen:
On this particular match structure - where exactly does integrity reside in this EPL match, Mr Integrity Man?
█████ ██████████ ██████████ ██████████ █████ █████ █████
█████ ██████████ ██████████ █████ █████ █████
█████ ██████████ ██████████ ██████████ ██████████ █████
█████ █████
█████ ██████████ ██████████ ██████████ ██████████ █████
Football is Fixed Network - Check Bucuresti Server
Anyway, further to redacted above, here is the initial article: see - Happy Anniversary To Roy Hodgson
And note that this match occurred a decade ago this month.
Corruption is deep-rooted in the Premier League.
And yet not once in the last ten years has the Guardian gone anywhere near disclosing these massive corruptions of which the paper has ended up being a corrupted part.
Integrity Man must be proud of his work.
David Skipwith Pemsel is exactly what the Premier League doesn't need.
************************************************************************
Question Twenty:
On the robustness of the mafia template
Thanks to the exertions of █████ █████, we now have a firm foundation and baseline for future systemic football corruptions in the Premier League.
Even if the momentum existed in Skipwith's nature, it is very difficult to pull football back from the brink of obsolescence at EPL-level.
There exists a robust mafia infrastructure in place.
At the Guardian, intentionally or by extreme fluke, Mr Integrity skipped with the mafia.
Let us hope that that particular addiction is satiated by the time he shadows the Premier League.
But will it be so, Integrity Man?
We guess not.
************************************************************************
________________________________________________________________________
"All you can talk about is money and fairy tales of eternal economic growth" - Greta Thunberg
A poem read by an Icelandic school pupil to the disappeared glacier Okjokull...
"Ok, the burdened glacier/ which at last had had enough/ of acts of terror from men who do not know/ how to have both profits and morals"
_______________________________________________________________________________
The Football is Fixed Network is unique.
We are in a niche of one.
We have no competitors.
_______________________________________________________________________________
If you have any information to contribute to Football is Fixed, please contact Ojo del Toro in complete confidence via Direct Message @footballisfixed. You can do so anonymously, but if you use your real name you can rest assured that this website operates a blanket policy of non-disclosure and does not cooperate with requests for details from the authorities or individuals.
Football is Fixed operate as a cellular network. We use the Iceberg Effect. We release 5% of our analytics and any hacks made available to us. We retain 95% for strategic defence, constructive negotiation, court. In extremis, we recuse ourselves and operatives will ensure full publication of the relevant information in numerous territories.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
© Football is Fixed 2006-2019
