Sunday, 21 January 2007

More Technology and More Officials Please

The use of technology to prevent erroneous decisions by the match officials in the Premiership needs to be urgently addressed by the authorities. Other sports have successfully incorporated the use of video replays without any loss of excitement in the game but football refuses to embrace technology. This extends to FIFA and UEFA too.
The referees and their assistants have too much control and influence in games. Poor decisions not only affect outcomes, titles, promotion and relegation issues but also the careers of the participants. Equally disturbingly, when over £200m is being bet globally on the big matches, the officials take on a key and central role with regard to the markets.
I'll reluctantly accept that penalties, free kicks and sendings off will remain the province of the referees. But at least there is a degree of accountability with these decisions that enable one to determine the official's attitudes.
With respect to goal-line and offside, video technology must be used immediately. It's quick, accurate and honest and prevents any deliberate manipulation by the match officials. The 4th official has tv evidence available at the pitchside - it's a no-brainer.
However, the Professional Game Match Officials Board (PGMOB) together with the Premier League are insistent on giving the referees a greater degree of unilateral control on the pitch. Numerous micro-adjustments to enhance the power of officials have been created. Some examples are the determination of the amount of injury time; allowing key free kicks to be taken without a whistle (or not); prevention of stoppages for injuries where, historically, players would put the ball out of play; the selective usage of the advantage rule; the use of microphone technology to maintain omnipotent control of all aspects of the game. Other external randomising factors are also commonplace eg watering of the pitch and the use of different balls for both FA Cup and League Cup matches.
To prevent the development of infrastructures which allow corruption in the game, the control should be spread as widely as possible. How about two referees on the pitch; a 5th official with video technology; a far greater number of match officials on the roster; the avoidance of referees repeatedly teaming up with the same assistant referees; more women officials; using referees from other territories (already utilised in countries where corruption is acknowledged).
Our Trading Team thoroughly analyse and psychologically profile all match officials in all leagues. We make money from our observations of the corruption in football but we would prefer to make money from an honest and competitive sport.

Friday, 5 January 2007

20 Reasons Not To Bet On British Horseracing

British horseracing is riddled with corruption. 10 years ago, I undertook a PhD at The Centre for the Study of Gambling and Commercial Gaming at Salford University and my thesis was entitled "The Impact of Conspicuous Money on Outcome in British Horseracing Markets".
Via the catalyst of my tutor, Professor Neville Topham, I was able to meet with the powerbrokers of the industry sector in this country. One of the most fascinating series of encounters was with Rodney Brack - the Chief Executive of the British Horserace Betting Levy Board (BHBLB). In the initial interactions, we discussed the mechanisms that allow certain key operators within the sport to affect the outcome of races. Jokes were shared and there was a general air of good-natured bonhomie.
Prior to a later meeting at the BHBLB offices in London, Mr Brack had decided to do a background check on me. The Direct Action Movement, the Hunt Saboteurs and the Animal Liberation Front came up and, suddenly, we were at a very different race meeting! The CEO moved into duplicitous overdrive and everything that had been black was now white and vice versa. Corruption? Nonsense. Fixed races? You are biased. Previous discussions? Denials. I considered going public with my proof of the corruption in horseracing but eventually decided to utilise my knowledge in a more creative manner.
Below are the prime reasons why one shouldn't go anywhere near horserace betting markets unless you are muscled up with either inside information from the horse's mouth (as it were) or a state-of-the-art trading model.
1. For most races, the outcome is determined by betting patterns and liabilities. Form is virtually irrelevant. These betting patterns are not publicly available.
2. In football, we must endure corrupt players, referees and managers. The parallels in racing are jockeys, clerks of racecourses, trainers/owners. Corrupt bookmakers and industry sector officials are ubiquitous in both sports.
3. Never bet on the All Weather. These events are the most corrupted and randomised.
4. Many stables are betting stables and they employ proprietary trading strategies that can only be deciphered by a few select individuals. This adds volatility to the market.
5. Performance Enhancing Substances (PESs) are used widely in the sport.
6. All sources of potentially valuable information are industry-owned and, consequently, cannot be trusted.
7. Gambling winnings are not enforceable under law. Very few bookmakers allow winning accounts.
8. It is cruel.
9. The watering of racecourses (ostensibly to soften the ground) is a very manipulative tool that significantly affects the results of races.
10. The jockeys are well paid but obedient and they carry out the instructions of the key market operators.
11. The Racing Post and The Sporting Life and ALL the mainstream media print the information that the betting industry wishes them to print. Disinformation is the norm.
12. The technology utilised for photo finishes is able to be manipulated.
13. On the few occasions when there is a certainty, nobody will lay you a decent sized bet without cropping your price.
14. Betting rings are full of criminals, psychopaths, posh totty and associated slime merchants - it is not a sophisticated office space with it's permanent stench of corruption. Most people are losing money and, subconciously, they understand that they are being taken for a ride.
15. It panders to the establishment and reinforces class issues. Your money allows the upper and upper-middle classes to give prizes to each other; it provides taxation for the government and profit for the bookies and their shareholders.
16. Some of the leading Saudi owners have very opaque strategies for the horses in their ownership. It can seem like the equivalent of deciphering OPEC at times.
17. The key traders place their bets in private very early or as late as possible on the rails. The big betting firms only play the ring in the period leading up to the race. One must maximise the information to be competitive in such corrupted markets and it is often difficult to get your money on late.
18. The handicapping of racehorses is manipulated in favour of insiders.
19. Like the gypsy musicians in Romania, Irish trainers and jockeys are given respect by the establishment in this country. But it is a lacklustre, sneering and condescending respect - these people still think Eire is part of the British empire.
20. It is not a sport. It is a rigged casino game transferred to the countryside. Only a small minority of horseraces in this country are totally clean.